Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Burlington Green Runs for City Council

Yesterday, Ward 5 City Council candidate Rene Kaczka-Valliere stopped by my door for a nice, long chat. I will write up a post about that soon. In the mean time, you can read this information-filled press release about his campaign.

January 15, 2007 (Burlington, Vermont)—The Vermont Green Party has a fresh, new candidate in the local race for Burlington City’s Council. A social worker running for his first public office, René Kaczka-Vallière will formally announce his candidacy for the City Council race in Ward 5 at Department of Public Works, Conference Room, at 4:00pm on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

Kaczka-Vallière’s petition has been accepted by the Burlington Office of the Clerk/Treasurer and his name will appear on the ballot on March 6, 2007.

Kaczka-Vallière believes he and the Green Party can take the seat from Democratic incumbent, Joan Shannon, with his vision and plan to lead the city in spending less while adding value to the community.

In his official campaign announcement, Kaczka-Vallière will outline his four point campaign platform that he says, “will excite the concerned voters in his district.” The four-point campaign platform features the only concrete alternative made to date in the long-debated, hotly contested and sometimes detested “southern connector” proposal, among others:

Kaczka-Vallière’s Campaign Platform

1. As a City Councilor, Kaczka-Vallière will reform the unfairness of current applicable property taxes. As a social worker, Kaczka-Vallière witnesses first hand the negative impact of property taxes on the majority of ordinary people, especially the elderly. Some seniors are actually forced out of their homes, he says, because they cannot afford to pay a $3,000-4,000 annual property tax bill. “Most seniors struggle with day-the-day economic security. These individuals have spent their working lives giving to their families and our community, and continue to contribute to all of us in many ways,” argues Kaczka-Vallière. “I am committed to ending this unfair burden on people who literally cannot afford this expense.”

2. As a City Councilor, Kaczka-Vallière will address traffic, pollution, and unsafe streets. He has simple, cost-effective solutions to solve these problems. Kaczka-Vallière does not support the construction of new roads. “Roads are expensive to repair, and this is especially so in our typically cold climate,” he notes. He opposes the Champlain Parkway because of the long-term negative effects it will have on the city’s budget and on the environment. “If the goal is to save money, not spend more, I have a concrete alternative idea that will be both good for the neighborhoods and for local business,” he says. In place of building a new and expensive parkway, Kaczka-Vallière proposes an environmentally sound light rail system that will both create jobs, increase tourism and solve traffic problems.

3. As a City Councilor, Kaczka-Vallière will address men’s violence against women. “Men’s violence against women is serious social problem,” he says, “and male leaders in our community need to do more. Our community needs to know where every male leader stands on this issue.” He notes that the leading cause of death among pregnant women in this nation is murder by their male partners. Locally, 3,773 people called Women Helping Battered Women last year. “Male violence is the true name of the problem,” he notes, “in a society where 99.8 percent of convicted rapists are men.” Kaczka-Vallière will work to ensure Burlington becomes the safest city in the world for all women. “Addressing male violence is a political problem,” he argues, “not just a social phenomenon. That’s why the Green Party itself is based on principles of non-violence, social justice and feminism. The Green Party is a leader on this issue.”

4. As a City Councilor, Kaczka-Vallière will address inequity in local schools. “All children deserve to learn in suitable and equitable environments,” he says, “but busing, a recent suggestion, is not the answer.” He opposes this option because of the personal burden busing creates on children and families; the environmental burden caused by increased pollution and the economic burden of busing on school budgets.

“In fact, the Green Party believes in decentralization; that is how our school system should operate,” he says. “I am committed to improving the education of all children, especially those who have learning disabilities.”

Kaczka-Vallière’s Plan of Action

If elected, Kaczka-Vallière pledges to undertake three specific actions in his first year on the council.

1. Sponsoring a resolution calling upon the Vermont General Assembly to repeal and replace the statewide property tax. “Although largely a symbolic act, it will also make clear that this tax hurts seniors as well as ordinary people – homeowners and tenants alike. It is time for the largest City in Vermont to join the 52 other towns across Vermont who have called for property tax repeal,” he says.

2. Sponsoring a resolution calling on citizens to be active participants in the effort to address violence in the city. The resolution will specifically call upon men who witnessing other men’s violence against women to become vocal and active rather than passive supporters of other men’s violence and abuse of women.

3. Leading partners in an effort to create affordable housing in the city, which would result in diversifying and equalizing our schools.

To examine his campaign platform and action plan in greater detail visit voterene.org

14 comments:

J.D. Ryan said...

What are your thoughts on that? I like his platform, and there's a lot for both libs and cons to like in there. I've always thought if the Greens are going to get taken seriously, they need to build from the ground up instead of running for top ticket races with no grassroots base.

Anonymous said...

It's Monorail guy!

Charity said...

I know, anonymous. That is exactly what I said as I went to the door. But, after listening to him, he sounds like he has a lot of fresh ideas and we all know the council needs that. I agreed with a lot of what he had to say as opposed to Ms. Shannon, with whom I rarely agree.

I'm still hoping that a Republican or independent conservative or libertarian will come out of the woodwork.

I will write up more about him as soon as I can. I took my kids to my mom's for the day today and we just got home. No blogging all day! :-(

Anonymous said...

Anyone who would seriously suggest a monorail for this area is hopelessly out of touch with what it takes to actually implement anything resembling a big idea.

Look at the guy's website: on the "plan of action" page, under "Rene's Vision," is the following bullet point:

"René's Vision: This program would relieve our schools and businesses from having to purchase health insurance."

Wow that sounds great! What are the details of "this program," you ask? Uhh... well, it's called "this program." Nothing else is mentioned. I'm serious.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marge_vs._the_Monorail

"I call the big one Bitey!"

Charity said...

Anonymous, you are awesome. That is the first thing that I thought of when I first read about the monorail idea. I couldn't think of a good way to work it into the post I wrote then, though. I should have thought to check Dorkipedia. I could have named the post, "I call the big one Bitey." Ahh, I love hindsight. You should start a blog.

Haik Bedrosian said...

"light rail" refers to any local or city rail, whereas a "monorail" is on an elevated platform.

either would be way too costly for our population to support, but they are a nice dream.

Also, it is not within the power of a city councilor to end the propery tax, as Kaczka-Vallière promises.

The Green candidate has thought provoking ideas, but not partucularly pragmatic ones.

Anonymous said...

I think Haik misread the Green's platform. He said he will sponsor a resolution urging the Vermont General Assembly to repeal and replace the property tax which the city council does have the power to do.

And it is time Burlington sent the capital a strong message regarding this issue as many other selectboards and councils have done via resolution.

As he says it would be "largely a symbolic act, it will also make clear that this tax hurts seniors as well as ordinary people."

Anonymous said...

Haik, I realize you were on the city council so you should know that the council has the power to pass a resolution such as this.

52 Vermont towns have already done so.

Haik Bedrosian said...

"As a City Councilor, Kaczka-Vallière will reform the unfairness of current applicable property taxes."

This is what I read. I didn't see the part about the symbolic resolution.

Anonymous said...

The council does have power to change the property tax that does not relate to schools. The tax that pays for street repair and plowing.

Peace Rene

Haik Bedrosian said...

The council does have power to change the property tax that does not relate to schools. The tax that pays for street repair and plowing.

This is partly true. Technically the city could reduce the municipal property tax to zero, but it would take an act of the legislature to approve whatever funding mechanism was set up (e.g. an income tax) to replace it.

When I ran for council, I also believed I would step in and start doing good things right away. The best I could do in my one term was slow down a couple of bad things. The city operation is like a speeding freight train. It doesn't turn on a dime, no matter how well intended the council and the mayor are.

Good Luck Rene!

JayV said...

After reading René's platform and hearing him speak, my opinion of him has just kicked up another notch or two, which was difficult because on first impression, he was pretty high up on the scale. He will be a fresh, Green voice on our city council compared to the stodginess and lack of creativity of the current crop of incumbents.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Haik. I'll keep your comment in mind.

Anonymous said...

Well, the idea that local businesses are in any position to fund a monorail is creative thinking, I guess! Same goes for single payer at a municipal level. I'd love to see the specifics on that, they'd have to be very creative!